Berikutfakta Kabupaten Garut: 1. Sejarah Kabupaten Garut. Sejarah Kabupaten Garut berawal dari pembubaran Kabupaten Limbangan pada tahun 1811 oleh Daendels dengan alasan produksi kopi dari daerah Limbangan menurun hingga titik paling rendah nol. Sementara, bupati Kabupaten Limbangan menolak perintah menanam nila (indigo) atau sejenis polongThe powerful force behind the Charlie Charlie Challenge is gravity. Image credit Live Science "Charlie, Charlie, can we play?"That is the seemingly innocent question that begins a new "spirit-summoning" game that is taking the Internet by storm. The so-called Charlie Charlie Challenge is based on shaky science the objective is to summon a malignant spirit from beyond the grave, but there are some real and powerful forces behind this parlor game, according to one how the Charlie Charlie Challenge works players balance one horizontally aligned pencil on top of a vertically aligned pencil essentially, in the shape of a cross. Both writing utensils sit atop a piece of paper divided into four quadrants. Two of the quadrants are labeled "yes" and two are labeled "no." Players then invite a spirit, Charlie, to play with them. If the spirit is feeling playful, the top most pencil will allegedly spin until it points to "yes." Then the players can ask Charlie other yes or no questions and wait for the pencil to move again. [The Surprising Origins of 9 Common Superstitions]So what causes the pencils to spin of their own accord? Only one of the most powerful forces on Earth gravity. In order to balance one object on top of another, the topmost object's center of gravity a point where an object's mass is said to be concentrated must be positioned precisely over the supporting object. In the case of the Charlie Charlie Challenge, players balance two long objects with rounded edges on top of one another. Naturally, these hard-to-balance objects have a tendency to roll around."Trying to balance one pencil upon another results in a very unstable system," said Christopher French, head of the anomalistic psychology research unit at the University of London in the United Kingdom. "Even the slightest [draft] or someone's breath will cause the top pencil to move."And the precariously placed pencils will move around regardless of whether you summon a demon after balancing them, French told Live Science. This proves that there's no demonic force necessary for the pencil-moving effect to occur, he course, pencils that move without anyone touching them might seem spooky in the right setting in a candlelit room in the middle of the night, but as French pointed out, the situation is really no more threatening than a curtain blowing in the gamesTo be fair, gravity is not the only force at work in the Charlie Charlie Challenge. It's also possible that another formidable power, the power of suggestion, has a role to 2012 study published in the journal Current Directions in Psychological Science found that people often employ a "response expectancy" in certain situations. In other words, by anticipating that something will occur, a person's thoughts and behaviors will help bring that anticipated outcome to fruition. In the case of this spirit-summoning game, it could be that players expect a certain result and their actions during the game help bring it about for instance, a well-timed breath or a subtle wave of the hand.This hypothesis is similar to one suggested by French, who pointed out that many forms of recreational divination — like Ouija the board game where you put your hands on a piece of plastic that allegedly moves of its own accord to answer your questions or table turning an old-school parlor game where people put their hands on a table and wait for the table to turn of its own volition — involve the subconscious actions of participants. [Really? The World's Greatest Hoaxes]The "magic" behind the Ouija board and turning tables, along with pendulums and dowsing rods two other popular forms of divination, has been scientifically explained through something known as the "ideomotor effect," French ideometer effect was first described in the 19th century by the English doctor and physiologist William Carpenter. It suggests that it's the involuntarily muscular movements of the people using the plastic planchette in Ouija, or the people sitting around the table in table turning, that causes these objects to move. The ideometer effect doesn't completely explain the Charlie Charlie phenomenon, because players don't touch the pencils used in the game. However, the game is similar to these other examples because it involves what French calls "magical thinking," or the belief that a random event the spinning of a pencil is related to some unconnected, and in some cases imaginary, force or energy a spirit."Often the 'answers' received [in divination games] might be vague and ambiguous, but our inherent ability to find meaning — even when it isn't there — ensures that we will perceive significance in those responses and be convinced that an intelligence of some kind lay behind them," French Charlie Charlie Challenge is magical thinking at its finest, according to French, who explained that this sort of thinking may have played an important role in human evolution. It made sense for our human ancestors to see "sentience and intention" in unexplained everyday events, he said, because these events may have represented real threats that needed to be avoided."The cost of avoiding a threat that wasn't really there was far less than that of missing a threat that was really there," French tendency to attribute a deeper meaning to meaningless or unrelated events persists in modern brains, French said. He added that this innate tendency could help explain why so many people believe that the random responses in the Charlie Charlie Challenge really are coming from an intelligence that is trying to send them a Elizabeth Palermo techEpalermo. Follow Live Science livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on Live Science. Stay up to date on the latest science news by signing up for our Essentials newsletter. Elizabeth is a former Live Science associate editor and current director of audience development at the Chamber of Commerce. She graduated with a bachelor of arts degree from George Washington University. Elizabeth has traveled throughout the Americas, studying political systems and indigenous cultures and teaching English to students of all ages. Most Popular Hukumcharles berasal dari kata dasar hukum. Hukum charles memiliki arti dalam bidang ilmu kimia. Pengertian Hukum Charles Sejumlah gas pada tekanan konstan memiliki volume yang berbanding langsung dengan suhunya, berlaku untuk semua gas pada tekanan rendah. Kesimpulan Hukum charles adalah sejumlah gas pada tekanan konstan memiliki volume yang berbanding langsung dengan suhunya, berlaku untuk .
Le Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal CHUM est condamné par la Cour supérieure du Québec à payer 7 512 433,32$ à un consortium d’architectes et 4 824 397,27$ à un consortium d’ingénieurs mécanique et électrique en guise de dommages et intérêts. Le consortium d’architectes se compose des cabinets Birtz Bastien Beaudoin Laforest Architectes, Provencher Roy et Associés Architectes, Yelle, Maillé, Architectes et le Groupe ARCOP, BPYA. Le consortium d’ingénieurs mécanique et électrique se compose des bureaux Bouthillette Parizeau & Associés et Teknika HBA BPTH. Le jugement, rendu le 10 mars, portait notamment sur l’inexécution de conventions de services de la part du CHUM à l’égard de BPYA et de BPTH dans la construction du nouveau CHUM. Les deux consortiums reprochaient notamment au centre hospitalier d’avoir violé leurs droits contractuels et modifié des contrats initiaux. Il lui est reproché des refontes contractuelles unilatérales imposées par l’entremise des conventions de services amendées». Ces manœuvres étaient fautives et abusives» a estimé le juge. L’honorable juge Jeffrey Edwards précise dans son jugement que le CHUM a abusé de ses droits par une application excessive et déraisonnable de la clause de modification allant ainsi à l’encontre de ce qu’exige la bonne foi». Les réductions de mandats imposées par le biais des conventions de services amendées ont pour effet de réduire d’au moins deux tiers les prestations contractuelles de BPYA et de BPTH en vertu des conventions de services initiales» – Jugement de la Cour supérieure Le CHUM avait réduit les mandats donnés et avait donc privé ces consortiums d’honoraires professionnels. Les deux consortiums avaient été engagés comme équipes maîtres» pour réaliser le nouvel hôpital mais leurs rôles ont été réduits à ceux de professionnels accompagnateurs ou de conseils aux professionnels internes du CHUM. Compte tenu du fait que les dommages réclamés sont des pertes de profits, ils sont assujettis à la Taxe sur les produits et services TPS et à la Taxe de vente du Québec TVQ. Le CHUM devra payer des taxes de 1 102 487,15$ à BPYA et de 710 894,24$ à BPTH. La condamnation totalise donc plus de 14 M$. Les demandes initiales de dommages et intérêts étaient de 56 191 581$ pour BPYA, tandis que BPTH réclamait 25 293 632,60$. Le CHUM ne s’est pas prononcé s’il allait en appeler de la décision.
CharlesPaul Lambert Journal of Cancer Therapy Vol.13 No.8 , August 2, 2022 DOI: 10.4236/jct.2022.138044 7 Downloads 51 Views If you are one of those crotchety people who believe the kids these days are somehow less inspired than generations before, then I come bearing new evidence Even their superstitions are lamer than ours!“Charlie Charlie,” a game/Internet urban legend of sudden and inexplicable popularity, surged to the top of the global social media charts this weekend after kicking around on the Spanish-language Internet for much of eternity. As of this writing, CharlieCharlieChallenge has been tweeted more than million times. More people are Googling “Charlie Charlie” than virtually any other news all this about?! Below, our no-nonsense explainer for the old/ do you play Charlie Charlie?Simple! You could, if you wanted, even do it at your 1 Open your Vine and get the camera rolling. If you don’t have Vine, you ARE too old for this. Step 2 Draw an X on a piece of paper. Step 3 Label two of the resulting quadrants “no,” and the other two “yes.” Step 4 Place two overlapping pencils on each axis of your grid, crossing them in the middle. Step 5 Say “Charlie, Charlie, are you there?” and ask a question. “is one of my friends going to die soon,” “will I go to prom next May.” Step 6 Scream, Charlie is the "demonic" game/Internet urban legend of sudden and inexplicable popularity. We asked Charlie Charlie a few questions. Here's how to play. Video Tom LeGro/The Washington PostWhere did this come from?While it’s hard to pin down an exact country of origin, Charlie Charlie also spelled Charly Charly has a long history as a schoolyard game in the Spanish-speaking world. According to one seven-year-old Yahoo! Respuestas thread — that’s Yahoo Answers to you — kids have played a version of the “classic game” in Spain for this version with the crossed pencils was called the “Juego de la Lapicera” — a term that still turns up lots of creepy stuff on Google — and “Charlie Charlie” was a distinct game, played with colored pencils. At some point in their Internet and playground travels, the two games seem to have merged. In either case, both have always had demonic or supernatural connotations; one site calls Lapicera “the poor man’s Ouija board.”Why is it popular again right now?It’s always hard to say exactly why these things trend, but the latest bubble seems to have begun in late April in the Dominican province of Hato Mayor, when a local TV news station broadcast a very alarmist and unintentionally funny report about the “Satanic” game overtaking local schools. From there, social media users in the Dominican Republic began tweeting, Instagramming and Vining about the game; by mid-May, the phrase “Charlie Charlie” was trending on Dominican Twitter, an easy jump away from the rest of Spanish-language over the weekend, a 17-year-old girl in central Georgia Instagrammed her game and slapped it with the hashtag CharlieCharlieChallenge. That hashtag was, apparently, all the kids needed It’s been tweeted million times since is Charlie, anyway?Per various corners of the Spanish-speaking Internet a child who committed suicide, the victim of a fatal car accident, or a pagan Mexican deity who now convenes with the Christian devil. The Mexican deity bit, at least, is demonstrably untrue.“There’s no demon called Charlie’ in Mexico,” said Maria Elena Navez of BBC this as dangerous as some of the other viral teen challenges going around?That said, according to popular legend, Charlie haunts players who fail to say goodbye before they close out of the game. And there are, predictably, a whole lot of people who don’t love the kids-summoning-demons should I care? Should I even care?!I mean, you should definitely care if you’re seeking supernatural answers to your life questions. Excepting questions about love, death and money, which — per certain versions of the legend — Charlie will not answer.Even if that doesn’t exactly describe you, though, Charlie makes a killer case study in virality and how things move in and out of languages and cultures online. You’ll notice, for instance, a lot of players and reporters talking about the game as if it were new, when it’s actually — and more interestingly, I think — an old game that has just recently crossed the language is also, pretty notably, yet another example of the power of the teenage Internet. Write off their little games as silly, sure — but we never trended “Bloody Mary” or “Ouija board.”Liked that? Try these CharlesL. Knapp and Nathan M. Crystal, Problems in Contract Law Cases and Materials (Little Brown and Company 1993). H.S LMF in S, Hukum Kontrak: Teori Dan Penyusunan Kontrak (Sinar Grafika 2003). Jimly Asshiddiqie, Gagasan Kedaulatan Rakyat Dalam Konstitusi Dan Pelaksanaannya Di Indonesia (PT Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve 1994).Como nĂŁo pode ser diferente na internet, uma nova lenda urbana surgiu nos Ăşltimos tempos e tomou as redes sociais. Trata-se da brincadeira “Charlie Charlie” ou apenas “Charlie”, para os Ăntimos, em que pes-soas invocam um suposto demĂ´nio mexicano capaz de responder perguntas do pĂşblico. Basicamente, Charlie Ă© mais uma daquelas lendas no estilo da brincadeira do copo ou do compasso. Para montar o ritual de invocação, basta sobrepor dois lápis em formato de cruz sobre um pedaço de papel e, nos quadrados formados por eles, escrever as palavras “Sim” e “NĂŁo”. Depois Ă© sĂł perguntar “Charlie Charlie, vocĂŞ está aĂ?” e deixar a gravidade agir se o lápis se mover para o “Sim”, o espĂrito está presente e vocĂŞ pode fazer suas perguntas. NĂŁo demorou para que a lenda tomasse proporções gigantescas. Em poucos dias, redes sociais como Twitter, Vine e lnstagram foram inundadas por vĂdeos de pessoas tentando invocar Charlie – a brincadei-ra, inclusive, ganhou sua prĂłpria hashtag, a CharlieCharlieChallenge. É claro que nĂŁo faltam aqueles a acreditar com todas as forças no demĂ´nio mexicano – e atĂ© mesmo a se apavorar com suas manifestações, como os registros abaixo mostram Outra parte bizarra sobre o tal demĂ´nio Ă© sua origem. Segundo o jornal BBC News, que investigou todo o surgimento da lenda, simplesmente nĂŁo há qualquer menção de um demĂ´nio chamado “Charlie” no folclo-re mexicano. E isso, convenhamos, nĂŁo Ă© nenhuma surpresa, considerando o nome nada condizente com as lendas maias e astecas, das quais muitas mitologias desse povo costumam vir. EntĂŁo, de onde viria esse tal nome? De uma lenda feita pelos norte-americanos, claro. Ao que parece, os primeiros registros de Charlie no mundo online viriam do vĂdeo abaixo, datado de 2008, chamado “Jugan-do Charly Charlie”. A brincadeira, nĂŁo há como negar, se mostra bem diferente de como se tornou agora -prova de que, se esse demĂ´nio realmente existe, ele nĂŁo Ă© exatamente fĂŁ de formalidades na hora de invo-cá-lo. DESAFIO CHARLIE CHARLIE REALIZADO PELO BLOG ROLIM FOFOCA
Bukukarya Charles Duhigg, reporter investigasi The New York Times, ini merupakan salah satu buku pengembangan diri terlaris di dunia. Secara gamblang, buku The Power of Habit ini mengungkap temuan ilmiah terbaru yang menjelaskan mengapa kebiasaan ada, apa unsur-unsurnya, dan bagaimana kita dapat mengubah kebiasaan pribadi, organisasi, maupunHukumini dinamai ilmuwan Jacques Charles, yang merumuskan hukum asli dalam karyanya yang tidak diterbitkan dari tahun 1780-an. Dalam dua dari empat seri esai yang disajikan antara 2 dan 30 Oktober 1801, [2] John Dalton menunjukkan melalui eksperimen bahwa semua gas dan uap yang dia pelajari memuai dengan jumlah yang sama di antara dua titik
aycklCI.